免疫抑制IBD患者对新冠疫苗的抗体应答与肠道菌群及代谢组相关
创作:Sunflower 审核:aluba 01月17日
  • 纳入43名接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的IBD患者,18名之前感染过新冠病毒,检测接种2剂新冠疫苗(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19或BNT162b2)后的抗体应答;
  • 17名患者接种疫苗后的血清学应答低于几何平均值,且其肠道菌群多样性较低;
  • 嗜胆菌属的丰度与较高的血清学应答相关,链球菌属的丰度与较低的血清学应答相关;
  • 肠道菌群代谢产物三甲胺、异丁酸、ω-鼠胆酸与较高的血清学应答相关,琥珀酸、苯丙氨酸、牛磺胆酸和牛磺脱氧胆酸与较低的血清学应答相关。
主编推荐语
aluba
EBioMedicine上发表的一项最新研究结果,在43名接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的IBD患者中发现,接种2剂新冠疫苗后的抗体应答与肠道菌群多样性、组成及代谢产物相关。
关键字
延伸阅读本研究的原文信息和链接出处,以及相关解读和评论文章。欢迎读者朋友们推荐!
图片
EBioMedicine [IF:11.205]

The gut microbiota and metabolome are associated with diminished COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses in immunosuppressed inflammatory bowel disease patients

在免疫抑制的IBD患者中,肠道菌群和代谢组与新冠疫苗诱导的抗体应答减弱相关

10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104430

01-10, Article

Abstract & Authors:展开

Abstract:收起
Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF therapy exhibit attenuated humoral immune responses to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The gut microbiota and its functional metabolic output, which are perturbed in IBD, play an important role in shaping host immune responses. We explored whether the gut microbiota and metabolome could explain variation in anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses in immunosuppressed IBD patients.
Methods: Faecal and serum samples were prospectively collected from infliximab-treated patients with IBD in the CLARITY-IBD study undergoing vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Antibody responses were measured following two doses of either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 vaccine. Patients were classified as having responses above or below the geometric mean of the wider CLARITY-IBD cohort. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and bile acid profiling with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS) were performed on faecal samples. Univariate, multivariable and correlation analyses were performed to determine gut microbial and metabolomic predictors of response to vaccination.
Findings: Forty-three infliximab-treated patients with IBD were recruited (30 Crohn's disease, 12 ulcerative colitis, 1 IBD-unclassified; 26 with concomitant thiopurine therapy). Eight patients had evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Seventeen patients (39.5%) had a serological response below the geometric mean. Gut microbiota diversity was lower in below average responders (p = 0.037). Bilophila abundance was associated with better serological response, while Streptococcus was associated with poorer response. The faecal metabolome was distinct between above and below average responders (OPLS-DA R2X 0.25, R2Y 0.26, Q2 0.15; CV-ANOVA p = 0.038). Trimethylamine, isobutyrate and omega-muricholic acid were associated with better response, while succinate, phenylalanine, taurolithocholate and taurodeoxycholate were associated with poorer response.
Interpretation: Our data suggest that there is an association between the gut microbiota and variable serological response to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised patients. Microbial metabolites including trimethylamine may be important in mitigating anti-TNF-induced attenuation of the immune response.
Funding: JLA is the recipient of an NIHR Academic Clinical Lectureship (CL-2019-21-502), funded by Imperial College London and The Joyce and Norman Freed Charitable Trust. BHM is the recipient of an NIHR Academic Clinical Lectureship (CL-2019-21-002). The Division of Digestive Diseases at Imperial College London receives financial and infrastructure support from the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London. Metabolomics studies were performed at the MRC-NIHR National Phenome Centre at Imperial College London; this work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) (grant number MC_PC_12025) and infrastructure support was provided by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility is a partnership between the University of Exeter Medical School College of Medicine and Health, and Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. This project is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Exeter Clinical Research Facility. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.

First Authors:
James L Alexander

Correspondence Authors:
Tariq Ahmad,Nick Powell

All Authors:
James L Alexander,Benjamin H Mullish,Nathan P Danckert,Zhigang Liu,Marton L Olbei,Aamir Saifuddin,Melissa Torkizadeh,Hajir Ibraheim,Jesús Miguéns Blanco,Lauren A Roberts,Claire M Bewshea,Rachel Nice,Simeng Lin,Hemanth Prabhudev,Caroline Sands,Verena Horneffer-van der Sluis,Matthew Lewis,Shaji Sebastian,Charlie W Lees,Julian P Teare,Ailsa Hart,James R Goodhand,Nicholas A Kennedy,Tamas Korcsmaros,Julian R Marchesi,Tariq Ahmad,Nick Powell

评论